tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7746460.post113852945576449688..comments2007-03-04T18:49:27.218ZNatalie Bennettnoreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7746460.post-1138549205595668372006-01-29T15:40:00.000Z2006-01-29T15:40:00.000ZThe one on abortion still doesn't seem to be online, which is quite frustrating. Though I still reserve the right to tell the 47% who want to see the upper limit reduced that they are talking complete rubbish. No none is demanding that they have an abortion - just that the right to have one should be available! GRRRRRJohttp://www.josalmon.co.uknoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7746460.post-1138541245190482922006-01-29T13:27:00.000Z2006-01-29T13:27:00.000ZIt wasn't actually an online poll, though the results appeared online as well as in print.<BR/><BR/>The results for the rest of the survey can be found <A HREF="http://www.mori.com/polls/2006/obs060110.shtml" REL="nofollow">here</A>, though the question about abortion has now been changed to 'not released'. I read it before it was edited - and talked about it <A HREF="http://rhetoric.journalspace.com/?entryid=614" REL="nofollow">here</A>.bookdrunkhttp://rhetoric.journalspace.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7746460.post-1138539139283274172006-01-29T12:52:00.000Z2006-01-29T12:52:00.000ZAnd their basis for saying this is an online poll??!! Wow, you don't even have to be a statistician to know that those are incredibly unreliable. That's really irresponsbile of them.barbhttp://www.luckywhitegirl.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7746460.post-1138536539690107362006-01-29T12:08:00.000Z2006-01-29T12:08:00.000ZThe Observer caught my eye too - the funny thing is that it's results from last week's Observer poll on sexual attitudes, which appeared briefly on the MORI website and have apparently now disappeared.<BR/><BR/>Amongst the distortions I noted is the conflation of those who want the legal time limit reduced and those who want abortion to become impossible.bookdrunknoreply@blogger.com